> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Adam J. Richter wrote:
>
> > The following patch shrinks changes the implementation of
> > try_module_get() and friends to eliminate the special stopping of all
> > CPU's when a module is unloaded. Instead, it uses a read/write
> > semaphore in a perhaps slightly non-intuitive way.
>
> Hmm, I was waiting a bit for Rusty's comment, but there isn't any...
(Sorry, on holiday, skimming mail)
I like it *very* much! There's a small race, but it's easily fixed by
turning the local_dec into a module_put (or variant) (otherwise an
rmmod --wait can sleep forever, waking up and seeing a non-zero
refcount, and going back to sleep).
Three other requests, if I may.
It'd be nice to have a comment for the two smp_mb() eg. /* Must increment
before checking state */ and vice-versa above the one in module.c. Secondly
probably nicer to just rename the modlist_lock to module_lock and use that,
and thirdly merge with the racefix patch below if Linus hasn't already
taken it.
BTW, I'm away from the office for a couple of weeks, and even if I weren't,
my test box doesn't stay up for more than minutes under any recent kernel 8(
Can you stress test this and send to Linus?
> BTW making the module ref functions not inline saves about 5KB with the
> standard config.
Interesting. The "if (!module)" could theortically be dropped, but I
just looked at the sizes of try_module_get as a standalone function
for various config options (x86, gcc 3.2.3):
UNLOAD=y
SMP=y
PREEMPT=y
try_module_get() 78 bytes
UNLOAD=y
SMP=y
PREEMPT=n
try_module_get() 48 bytes
UNLOAD=y
SMP=n
PREEMPT=n
try_module_get() 28 bytes
UNLOAD=n
try_module_get() 21 bytes
These numbers are a bit exaggerated due to function prologue and
epilogues, but on x86 PREEMPT=y case at least I definitely think that
it's worth out-of-lining it (a straight function call costs about 11
bytes). Don't know about other archs.
Thanks for the patch!
Rusty.
-- there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoyName: Fix two module races Author: Bob Miller, Rusty Russell Status: Trivial
D: Bob Miller points out that the try_module_get in use_module() can, D: of course, fail. Secondly, there is a race between setting the module D: live, and a simultaneous removal of it.
diff -urpN --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.62-bk6/kernel/module.c working-2.5.62-bk6-modraces/kernel/module.c --- linux-2.5.62-bk6/kernel/module.c 2003-02-18 11:18:57.000000000 +1100 +++ working-2.5.62-bk6-modraces/kernel/module.c 2003-02-24 13:42:44.000000000 +1100 @@ -173,16 +173,19 @@ static int use_module(struct module *a, struct module_use *use; if (b == NULL || already_uses(a, b)) return 1; + if (!strong_try_module_get(b)) + return 0; + DEBUGP("Allocating new usage for %s.\n", a->name); use = kmalloc(sizeof(*use), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!use) { printk("%s: out of memory loading\n", a->name); + module_put(b); return 0; } use->module_which_uses = a; list_add(&use->list, &b->modules_which_use_me); - try_module_get(b); /* Can't fail */ return 1; } @@ -1456,10 +1459,12 @@ sys_init_module(void *umod, } /* Now it's a first class citizen! */ + down(&module_mutex); mod->state = MODULE_STATE_LIVE; module_free(mod, mod->module_init); mod->module_init = NULL; mod->init_size = 0; + up(&module_mutex); return 0; }
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/