Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)

Szakacsits Szabolcs (szaka@sienet.hu)
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:41:46 +0100 (MET)


On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:34:52 +0100 (MET) Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu> wrote:

> | Anyway, considering how bogus the oops was and Randy already had two
> | oops'es before this NTFS one, I think the NTFS driver was a sufferer
> | of other trouble(s) than the originator. So unless one can reproduce
> | something close to this one (or Randy sends his first [two] oops), I
> | would just trash
> |
> | http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432
>
> I must have missed something here. What other 2 oopses are you referring to?

Quoting from your report:

==> Mar 1 13:35:44 midway kernel: Oops: 0002

This means oops counter is 2. So there were two oopses before with
counter value 0 and 1.

> As for closing bug reports because they are not reproducible...

No. Not because it's not reproducible however because it's untrustable
and bogus. Unless as I mentioned before ... please see above. Thanks!

Szaka

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/