Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.63-mm2 + i/o schedulers with contest

[Con Kolivas]

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:10 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Con Kolivas <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > Mem_load result of AS being slower was just plain weird with the result
> > rising from 100 to 150 during testing.
>
> Maybe we should just swap computers or something?
>
> Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 145 user: 180 system: 18
> Finished mem_load: elapsed: 146 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 5000
> Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 181 system: 17
> Finished mem_load: elapsed: 136 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800
> Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 181 system: 17
> Finished mem_load: elapsed: 130 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800
>
> 256MB, dual CPU, ext3/IDE.

Tried again - these were done as part of a full contest run, not just mem_load 
by itself, but these were the mem_load results:

98
128
135

then it oopsed (the one I posted earlier) and wasn't really usable after that 
point. Perhaps they're related. The mystery remains. I'll see what happens 
next mm release.

Con