Re: [PATCH] remove DEVFS_FL_AUTO_DEVNUM

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
2 Mar 2003 12:16:39 -0800

Followup to: <20030301190724.B1900@lst.de>
By author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Rationale: while dynamic major/minors are a good idea, devfs is the
> wrong layer to do it because all code relying on it would break with
> out devfs.
>

Your first clause here is a *highly* questionable statement...

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: cris ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/