Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.62

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:09:35PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:39:07AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >  usr/lib/arch/arm/MCONFIG                        |   26
> Any good reasons for such a screaming name?
> makefile.config eventually.

Ask Peter :)

> >  usr/lib/arch/arm/Makefile.inc                   |   31
> 
> No extension is used for arch/arm/Makefile
> Why does klibc differ in this respect?
> [An answer that tell me that arch/arm/Makefile should
> change is fine with me..]

Ask Russell :)

> >  usr/lib/makeerrlist.pl                          |   80 
> >  usr/lib/socketcalls.pl                          |   75 
> 
> This mixture of code and scripts to generate code hursts my eye.
> What about usr/scripts/.

But they are the scripts used to build the code in usr/lib.  I don't
care where they go, that's just where they were in the klibc tarball.

> I assume you do not want them in scripts/

Yeah, I wouldn't think they should go their either.

thanks,

greg k-h