Re: [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible?

Werner Almesberger (wa@almesberger.net)
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:14:00 -0300

Roman Zippel wrote:
> Um, another point, let's ignore "minimum invasive migration plans", if we
> found a good solution, we can still figure out how to get there smoothly,
> so this shouldn't be a primary concern.

In my next posting, I just wrote (this very minute)

"For brainstorming's sake, let's not worry about backward-compatibility
for now:"

So I guess I don't need this disclaimer then ;-)

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/