Re: Signal/gdb oddity in 2.5.61

[Jeff Dike]

[e-mail] said:
> Anyone who wants to use an old gdb with a new kernel can use "handle
> SIGSTOP nopass".  Is that a real imposition?  Anyway, aside from the
> test suite, it only affects gdb users in a way that may confuse them
> for a few seconds but doesn't prevent them from debugging normally. 

It may also affect UML, since it has come to know exactly what to expect
from a ptraced process.  So, when you have the semantics nailed down and
implemented, can you see if UML still runs?

Not that it's a showstopper if it doesn't, but I'd like to know so I can
fiddle UML so that it continues to run.

				Jeff