Re: [PATCH][2.5][8/14] smp_call_function_on_cpu - s390

Ulrich Weigand (weigand@immd1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de)
Sat, 15 Feb 2003 23:07:01 +0100 (MET)


Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:

> This could be achieved if s390 (or if we had a generic one, this is
> another story...) had a for_each_cpu type iterator, which would also
> cover aforementioned mask &= cpu_online_map issue, but as an aside, it is
> harder to track down lockups from things like IPIs to invalid cpus than a busy loop
> waiting for num_cpus.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. In any case, at least
on S/390, doing a SIGP to an invalid CPU will simply get you an
'not operational' indication (condition code 3), so in fact the
only problem *is* the busy loop on num_cpus ...

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/