Re: Kexec, DMA, and SMP

Corey Minyard (cminyard@mvista.com)
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 12:23:21 -0600


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Werner Almesberger wrote:

|Corey Minyard wrote:
|
|>Yes, we were talking about temporary stopgaps.
|
|
|Yes, that's what Suparna and Eric were discussing :-)
|
|>But, I had another idea. What about using power management? If you
|>suspended everything, would that be good enough. I looked at a few
|>drivers, and it seemed so.
|
|
|As long as you don't need any form of synchronization to power
|down a device, and if it comes up silent (i.e. no "sleep" mode,
|in which it still has enough power to remember DMA lists and
|such), that would work.
|
|I'd suspect that power management requiries you to synchronize,
|so we're back to square one.

Yes, some do and some don't. You could define a new state for the
"suspend" call that says "just shut down with no locks". But the
infrastructure is already in the PCI code and others to do a suspend,
you could use that and take it out of all the CONFIG_PM ifdefs.

- -Corey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+TTQXmUvlb4BhfF4RArOXAJ4o5F7zgV6zZv9jAXBx5za2xvnZUgCfYj9A
byMvWFosxYMN6/0Ibmk7Ors=
=RLPc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/