Re: 2.5.60 cheerleading...

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:09:22 -0500


Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 09:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Just to counteract all the 2.5.60 bug reports...
>>
>>After the akpm wave of compile fixes, I booted 2.5.60-BK on my Wal-Mart
>>PC [via epia], and ran LTP on it, while also stressing it using
>>fsx-linux in another window. The LTP run showed a few minor failures,
>>but overall 2.5.60-BK is surviving just fine, and with no corruption.
>
> Can you send me your list of failures and version of LTP? I'd like to
> make sure they match up with the known list of problems.

Version is CVS-latest, checked out last night.

Some of the failures were obvious: kernel module syscalls were failing,
as I would expect them to if they had not been updated for 2.5.x module
support. There were also a couple signal-related things, IIRC.
Unexpected failures included some file locking test failures.

Anyway, don't worry... you will be getting more concrete info soon :) I
am tracking down right now why the 2.5.x floppy driver ends all I/O
requests with an error. After that, I'll have output from a full LTP
run for you :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/