Re: Linux 2.5.60
Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:38:01 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
> One of yours hand merged UML updates/fixes in, and another one broke it badly by introducing
> sigprocmask(). Now there is a conflict between in-kernel sigprocmask() and
> glibc's sigprocmask() (that UML uses to manage signal delivery to right thread).
> Can we please change the name of in-kernel's sigprocmask() to avoid name clash? ;)
No. I'm not goinmg to start caring about user-land naming in-kernel, that
way is a slippery slope. This is firmly a UML problem.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/