Is a new fs needed? Is it not possible to use an existing filesystem of the
user's choice for local caching?
> ...
>
> (*) PG_journal
> (*) PG_journalmark
Well. If you new fs goes in then yes, we can spare those bits (just). If
possible, consider making them "opaque address_space-private", so this prime
real estate can be shared with other filesystems (eg, PG_checked).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/