Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3

Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:00:51 +0300


Andrew Morton wrote:

>Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Is it true that there is no manpage available anywhere for fadvise?
>>
>>
>>
>
>It's pretty simple.
>
>http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/posix_fadvise.html
>
>It's also basically unimplementable without the radix tree, so I don't how
>other systems can be doing it. Maybe they just lock up for a day when
>someone does fadvise64(fd, 0, -1, FADV_DONTNEED) ;)
>
>
>
>
>
Andrew, don't you think you should write a linux manpage and/or other
documentation when you add system calls like fadvise to linux? Also,
Andrew, your measurements would be a lot more understandable if you did
not use programs written by you and not present in any linux distro (do
I understand that correctly?) without defining what they do. Yes? ;-)

-- 
Hans

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/