Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest

[Con Kolivas]

On Saturday 01 Feb 2003 9:21 am, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Actually the most "felt" of these loads is io_load and based on these
> results: io_load:
> Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2559ext3        3       109     68.8    4       10.1    1.40
> 2559jfs         3       138     54.3    11      13.8    1.77
> 2559reiser      3       98      76.5    2       9.2     1.24
> 2559xfs         3       124     60.5    6       8.0     1.57
>

Here is a set of dbench_load results:
dbench_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2559ext3        3       115     65.2    3       24.3    1.47
2559jfs         3       123     61.8    3       19.5    1.58
2559reiser      3       108     69.4    3       13.9    1.37
2559xfs         3       118     63.6    3       22.0    1.49

Note the order correlates with the order of the io_load results.

Once again reiserfs held up kernel compilation the least. Note they all 
accomplished the same work in that time though.

Con