Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest

Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:21:56 +0000

On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:56:07PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive,
> and thus a better FS benchmark.
>
> What do you think?

It's hardly a realistic real-world benchmark if you start nobbling
bits of it though. Not reading the preprocessed output is sure
to bump the benchmark points on an fs optimised for lots of small
writes.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/