Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX

[Dieter Nützel]

Am Montag, 27. Januar 2003 19:33 schrieb Chris Mason:
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:14, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > Hello Chris,
> >
> > as always very nice work!
> > I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1).
> > Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all.
> > My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance is
> > great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet.
>
> Thanks for trying them out.
>
> > But some question stay open:
> > Where is 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff
>
> 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff is in the 2.4.21 data logging directory you
> linked to below.

It was and I have it but it isn't any longer...
Both 01- are missing, now

> >  and 01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff?
>
> This is in the namesys pending directory, but doesn't apply cleanly
> yet.

OK, you moved it;-)

> I'm rediffing both the quota code and the data logging code on top
> of 01-iput-deadlock-fix (or I might just steal Manuel's rediff, which is
> still in my linuxworld backlog).

Manuel's version (33b) had some trouble with -pre3aa1 (-pre3-jam3), too.

> > Isn't it needed anylonger 'cause you merged them and SuSE's ftp isn't
> > updated yet? All files are the "old" one's from 15. January.
> > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
> >
> > What about patch-2.4.20.rfs.06.05-transaction-overflow-fix-0.diff?
> > Should I put it on top, too?
>
> That is included in 05-data-logging-33.

Nice, no recompile needed then ;-)

I'll do some "normal" vs data=journal/ordered "time synctest -F -f -n 1 -t 100 
dir_name" tests, now.

Maybe I integrate preemption...

-Dieter