When I sent a bug report to the author of mkisofs, Jörg Schilling, I
got the reply
>>mkisofs 2.01a01 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>>mkisofs 2.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>>mkisofs 1.15a27 (i686-suse-linux)
>
>>Google shows no reference to anything which tells me that this is not
>>supposed to work, therefore I assume it's a bug.
>
>Nachdenken hilft wie in vielen Fällen auch hier:
>
>Der Bug auch hier ist da, wo es wegen schlechter SW Qualität wahrscheinlicher
>ist: Im Linux Kernel.
(Translation: thinking helps here too, like in many other cases: the bug
is in the linux kernel, where it is more likely to be due to lower
software quality.)
Insults aside, is it true that the kernel's isofs can't produce correct
inode numbers for hardlinked files? If that is the case it would
somewhat reduce the usefulness of isofs for backups.
Volker
-- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/