Re: More on Linux and iSCSI [info, not flame :)]

[Oliver Xymoron]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:10:24PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > 	http://sourceforge.net/projects/intel-iscsi
[..]
> > Don't know what the state of interop with other initiators is though.
> > 
> > I'll also point out that for many Linux<->Linux purposes, nbd is a workable
> > substitute. 
> 
> You are so correct in the Linux<->Linux model, but remember the other OS
> has the dominate market space. 

Really? Must admit I haven't been paying attention to FreeBSD lately.. ;)

> I have proof of interoperability. Better yet I have performance
> proof without the ability to control the benchmark environment.

I'm sure that's great, but until it's also DFSG compliant, it's
effectively vaporware in my book.

> IIRC that reference is set at version 6.

They're actually up to 18.

-- 
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."