Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.54_delay-cleanup_A0

[john stultz]

On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Wouldn't it be saner to initialize the timer to something that can at 
> least do estimated loops, and then just unconditionally do
> 
> 	timer->delay(..);
> 
> instead?

Basically a default timer_null structure? Sure that can be done (I think
others have suggested this as well, but I've just not had the time to
get around to it). I'll see if I can scratch that out quickly and
resend. 

thanks for the feedback!
-john