Re: 2.5.54 ide-scsi and cdrecord

[sean darcy]

That did It!

[root@amd1900 root]# cdrecord -scanbus -dev=/dev/hdc
Cdrecord 2.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 J?rg Schilling
scsidev: '/dev/hdc'
devname: '/dev/hdc'
scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2
Warning: Open by 'devname' is unintentional and not supported.
Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27
Using libscg version 'schily-0.7'
scsibus0:
        0,0,0     0) 'SONY    ' 'CD-RW  CRX195E1 ' 'ZYS5' Removable CD-ROM
        0,1,0     1) *
        0,2,0     2) *
        0,3,0     3) *
        0,4,0     4) *
        0,5,0     5) *
        0,6,0     6) *
        0,7,0     7) *

But look what happens if I use ATAPI:x,y,z ( tried all the combinations - 
same result):

[root@amd1900 root]# cdrecord -scanbus -dev=ATAPI:1,0,0
Cdrecord 2.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 J?rg Schilling
scsidev: 'ATAPI:1,0,0'
devname: 'ATAPI'
scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0
Warning: Using ATA Packet interface.
Warning: The related libscg interface code is in pre alpha.
Warning: There may be fatal problems.
Using libscg version 'schily-0.7'
scsibus0:
        0,0,0     0) 'ADAPTEC ' 'ACB-5500        ' 'FAKE' NON CCS Disk
        0,1,0     1) *
        0,2,0     2) *
        0,3,0     3) *
        0,4,0     4) *
        0,5,0     5) *
        0,6,0     6) *
        0,7,0     7) *

FWIW, this is what the new xcdroast shows. Just never knew I had an Adaptec 
cdrw!!

BTW, is there a patch to fix ide-scsi yet?

thanks

>From: Jens Axboe <[e-mail]>
>To: sean darcy <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: 2.5.54 ide-scsi and cdrecord
>Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 16:37:28 +0100
>
>On Sat, Jan 04 2003, sean darcy wrote:
> > What am I missing? I thought we didn't need the scsi layer anymore.
>
>cdrecord -dev=/dev/hdX
>
>--
>Jens Axboe

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail