Re: [PATCH] generic device DMA (dma_pool update)

[Adam J. Richter]

Andrew Morton wrote:
>"Adam J. Richter" wrote:
>> 
>> David Brownell wrote:
>> 
>> >struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(char *, struct device *, size_t)
>> >void dma_pool_destroy (struct dma_pool *pool)
>> >void *dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *, int mem_flags, dma_addr_t *)
>> >void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *, void *, dma_addr_t)
>> 
>>         I would like to be able to have failure-free, deadlock-free
>> blocking memory allocation, such as we have with the non-DMA mempool
>> library so that we can guarantee that drivers that have been
>> successfully initialized will continue to work regardless of memory
>> pressure, and reduce error branches that drivers have to deal with.
>> 
>>         Such a facility could be layered on top of your interface
>> perhaps by extending the mempool code to pass an extra parameter
>> around.  If so, then you should think about arranging your interface
>> so that it could be driven with as little glue as possible by mempool.
>> 

>What is that parameter?  The size, I assume.

	No, dma address.  All allocations in a memory pool (in both
the mempool and pci_pool sense) are the same size.

Adam J. Richter     __     ______________   575 Oroville Road
[e-mail]     \ /                  Milpitas, California 95035
[phone]         | g g d r a s i l   United States of America
                         "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."