Re: [BENCHMARK] vm swappiness with contest
Con Kolivas (conman@kolivas.net)
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:20:53 +1100
On Tuesday 31 Dec 2002 6:08 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > ...
> > post usemem:
> > MemTotal: 257296 kB
> > MemFree: 86168 kB
> > Buffers: 392 kB
> > Cached: 2244 kB
> > SwapCached: 632 kB
> > Active: 159484 kB
> > Inactive: 1380 kB
> > HighTotal: 0 kB
> > HighFree: 0 kB
> > LowTotal: 257296 kB
> > LowFree: 86168 kB
> > SwapTotal: 4194272 kB
> > SwapFree: 4192668 kB
> > Dirty: 60 kB
> > Writeback: 0 kB
> > Mapped: 1768 kB
> > Slab: 6748 kB
> > Committed_AS: 6588 kB
> > PageTables: 196 kB
> > ReverseMaps: 619
>
> OK, thanks. It's a memory leak.
>
> Could you please send me a detailed description of how to
> set about reproducing this?
>
> When you say "I ran contest for a few days till I recreated the problem
> and it did recur.", does this imply that the leak was really slowly
> increasing, or does it imply that everything was fine for a few days
> uptime and then it sudddenly leaked a large amount of memory?
I ran contest -n 100 -l all
which should run all loads 100 times. The dbench_load results remained pretty
much static until about the 60th run and then it started increasing fairly
rapidly.
dbench_load doesnt exist in contest 0.51, but running dbench_load by itself
did NOT reproduce the problem - I tried this first. Dbench_load just seemed
to notice it the most, so it's one of the other loads in contest exposing the
leak which are all in v 0.51. Unfortunately I cant say for certain which of
the loads it is.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/