Re: holy grail

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Sat, 28 Dec 2002 18:43:39 -0200 (BRST)


On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Anomalous Force wrote:
> --- Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net> wrote:
>
> > because it would be completely unmaintainable (1,2). (I expect to
>
> this is not true. if the system were an integral part of the overall
> design, then programming would include it apriori.

This has been said before, but "for some reason" everybody
who said it went quiet the moment they started working on
a patch and have never been heard from again.

Either they're still working on the problem (after a four
years) or they've moved on to an easier/realistic project.

regards,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/