Re: [PATCH] Allow UML kernel to run in a separate host address space

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Jeff Dike wrote:
> This is a large patch, but
> 	it's all under arch/um and include/asm-um
> 	a lot of it is code movement

Pulled, but that /proc/mm crap has to go (it wasn't in this patch, or I 
would have rejected it). 

What are the semantics the host code wants/needs, and how can we implement
a sane generic mechanism that doesn't involve opening magic files?

Having co-processes isn't wrong in itself, I just want the support to be 
clean and generic, instead of a huge hack.

		Linus