Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - exit_weight
Denis Vlasenko (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:24:10 -0200
On 21 December 2002 19:18, Con Kolivas wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> osdl hardware, contest results, 2.5.52-mm2 with scheduler tunable -
> exit weight (ew1= exit weight ==1 and so on)
>
> io_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> ew0 [5] 105.3 90 16 22 2.91
> ew1 [5] 86.4 97 12 18 2.39
> ew2 [5] 74.9 109 9 18 2.07
> ew3 [5] 84.2 100 11 19 2.33
> ew4 [5] 83.8 102 10 18 2.31
> ew5 [5] 89.9 93 12 20 2.48
> ew6 [5] 97.5 88 13 20 2.69
> ew7 [5] 89.2 95 12 20 2.46
In spite of worrying reports of decreasing single task performance,
does it make sense to add "null_load" test? ;)
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/