> > First of all, "standard templates" are tested that they will be
> > compiled without problem. They should be able to boot.
> > They should have a working "framework" of "modules", for
> example, lsmod
> > works without any problem. (And any other "required"
> modutils as well)
> > They shuold supports further kernel compile. (With small incremental
> > changes to the base "standard template").
>
> Sounds like an excellent job for a new kernel hacker to take on board
> - why not make the standard templates yourself, and post them
> to the list for each 2.5.x tree. It *would* be quite useful,
> and save a lot of developers' time, for example, it would
> stop a lot of people complaining about modular IDE.
>
I can post my config as I am using common hardware config.
But I cannot make the "framework" of "modules" working for me.
> > Then I can try to compile my lan card as modules.
> > Then try to compile my SCSI card, etc, etc.
> >
> > Does similar "standard templates" exist already?
>
> No.
>
> > Where can I search for known bugs centrally, so that I can
> help myself
> > as much as possible?
>
> * The mailing list archives
> * Kernel Bugzilla
> * (hopefully in a week or so) my new bug database which I am currently
> writing.
>
> John.
Sampson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/