Re: 2.5.49: Severe PIIX4/ATA filesystem corruption

[H. Peter Anvin]

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> The base 2.5.47/8/9 Linus tree PIIX code has had no corruption reports
> (except someone whose box failed memtest86) and its about the most
> tested IDE controller.
> 
> I would be interested to know what happens if you boot a base 2.5.49
> without raid6 adulteration and stress it on your hw there, just to be
> sure.
 >

I will try it once the system gets put back together, which will be in 
about two weeks (we're moving, and today was computer teardown day.) 
All I have ATM is my laptop, which I won't be running experimental stuff 
on :-/

	-hpa