Re: Compiling x86 with and without frame pointer
Denis Vlasenko (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:55:30 -0200
On 25 November 2002 06:52, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Anyway it makes me wonder, whether kernelcompilation shouldn't be
> > configurable between a "optimize for (compressed image) size" and a
> > "optimize for speed" option... I'd go for speed... (and always
> > omitting frame-pointers doesn't seem to as fast as omitting them
> > only in leaf functions).
>
> hehe :-)
> I've put this in my kernels for about 2 years now. You can also
> reduce the image size with -malign-jumps=0
> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 and -mcpu=i386.
Hehe indeed ;)
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/