> I just implemented epoll_create, epoll_ctl and epoll_wait for the diet
> libc and found that epoll_wait in 2.5.59 does not expect struct
> epoll_event* as second argument but actually struct pollfd*.
>
> That makes it more useful in one sense because porting old poll programs
> is easier this way. On the other hand, it makes the whole API less
> useful because the epoll_ctl call is documented to use struct
> epoll_event which contains opaque user data to enlist a file descriptor.
> This data can now not be passed back to user space because it does not
> fit in struct pollfd.
>
> By the way: the epoll API looks great! I especially like the opaque
> user specified data thing, however making it a union is not so smart
> because strace can't meaningfully display it. Also, I would move the
> "int fd" out of the union because it is universally useful to know the
> file descriptor without having to save it in the opaque data.
This will be the file that I'll submit to Ulrich for inclusion in glibc :
#ifndef _SYS_EPOLL_H
#define _SYS_EPOLL_H 1
#include <sys/types.h>
enum EPOLL_EVENTS {
EPOLLIN = 0x001,
#define EPOLLIN EPOLLIN
EPOLLPRI = 0x002,
#define EPOLLPRI EPOLLPRI
EPOLLOUT = 0x004,
#define EPOLLOUT EPOLLOUT
#ifdef __USE_XOPEN
EPOLLRDNORM = 0x040,
#define EPOLLRDNORM EPOLLRDNORM
EPOLLRDBAND = 0x080,
#define EPOLLRDBAND EPOLLRDBAND
EPOLLWRNORM = 0x100,
#define EPOLLWRNORM EPOLLWRNORM
EPOLLWRBAND = 0x200,
#define EPOLLWRBAND EPOLLWRBAND
#endif /* #ifdef __USE_XOPEN */
#ifdef __USE_GNU
EPOLLMSG = 0x400,
#define EPOLLMSG EPOLLMSG
#endif /* #ifdef __USE_GNU */
EPOLLERR = 0x008,
#define EPOLLERR EPOLLERR
EPOLLHUP = 0x010
#define EPOLLHUP EPOLLHUP
};
/* Valid opcodes ( "op" parameter ) to issue to epoll_ctl() */
#define EPOLL_CTL_ADD 1 /* Add a file decriptor to the interface */
#define EPOLL_CTL_DEL 2 /* Remove a file decriptor from the interface */
#define EPOLL_CTL_MOD 3 /* Change file decriptor epoll_event structure */
typedef union epoll_data {
void *ptr;
int fd;
__uint32_t u32;
__uint64_t u64;
} epoll_data_t;
struct epoll_event {
__uint32_t events; /* Epoll events */
epoll_data_t data; /* User data variable */
};
__BEGIN_DECLS
/*
* Creates an epoll instance.
*
* Returns an fd for the new instance.
*
* The "size" parameter is a hint specifying the number of file
* descriptors to be associated with the new instance.
*
* The fd returned by epoll_create() should be closed with close().
*/
extern int epoll_create(int size);
/*
* Manipulate an epoll instance "epfd".
*
* Returns 0 in case of success, -1 in case of error ( the "errno" variable
* will contain the specific error code )
*
* The "op" parameter is one of the EPOLL_CTL_* constants defined above.
* The "fd" parameter is the target of the operation.
* The "event" parameter describes which events the caller is interested
* in and any associated user data.
*/
extern int epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd, struct epoll_event *event) __THROW;
/*
* Wait for events on an epoll instance "epfd".
*
* Returns the number of triggered events returned in "events" buffer.
* Or -1 in case of error with the "errno" variable set to the specific error code.
*
* The "events" parameter is a buffer that will contain triggered events.
* The "maxevents" is the maximum number of events to be returned
* ( usually size of "events" ).
* The "timeout" parameter specifies the maximum wait time in milliseconds
* ( -1 == infinite ).
*/
extern int epoll_wait(int epfd, struct epoll_event *events, int maxevents,
int timeout) __THROW;
__END_DECLS
#endif /* #ifndef _SYS_EPOLL_H */
This is waht my current code implements. As soon has Linus will merge my
latest bits ( likely in 2.5.50 ) this will be the interface exposed by the
kernel, and the one that will go in glibc. The latest change is the
removal of "revents" ( Jamie suggestion ) and the usage of "events" for
both setting the interest mask and retrieving the available events.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/