Or so they say. They could also use this power for evil. Also, what's up
with that "GPL version 2 or later" stuff? I always take that out of my
licenses. While I understand that if I die, its then sort of trapped
under GPL2, I really don't want whoever decides to make the next GPL
changing the licensing on my program significantly...
--Zac
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> Blatantly false. Have you even _read_ the GPL? It doesn't seem that way -
> in which case why are you discussing it?
>
> Please get your facts straight. While you're at it, please avoid making
> yourself look like an idiot in the future.
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, archaios wrote:
>
> > When you GPL a piece of software, you sign over your rights to the FSF. Therefore, there is very little that can be done about this;
> > from a legal perspective, the FSF _itself_ determines what is and what isn't construed as a derived work.
> >
> > - David McIlwraith
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ross Vandegrift <ross@willow.seitz.com>
> > To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
> > Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:59:26AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> [snip]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/