Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available.

[Paul Larson]

--=-GFMFLwNI315WQUozyUV5
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:15, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 02:53, Eric Northup wrote:
> > Would this be an appropriate use of the "version" tag in Bugzilla?  Cur=
rently=20
> > the only choice is "2.5", but if that were renamed to "2.5-linus", then=
 the=20
> > other heavily used patchsets could be monitored while making it easy fo=
r=20
> > people who only want to see bugs in Linus' tree.
>=20
> That works for me. Create a 2.5-ac product that is assigned to me. I can
> then reassign them all to DaveM as appropriate
I think this is an excellent idea.  It shouldn't require much effort to
get bugs directed to the people would would be most likely to care about
it.  That was my thinking when I suggested the "send a one time copy of
this bug report to <email address>".  If the right person is already set
up to get the report though, this feature wouldn't be needed (as often).

-Paul Larson

--=-GFMFLwNI315WQUozyUV5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAj3VFZcACgkQbkpggQiFDqcnMACfWqs+O+oyhKmxytTShgidNl94
h7gAn11Oxlk1FkXSek3aXfdPGB7iFK0e
=O1vP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-GFMFLwNI315WQUozyUV5--