Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available.

[Nicolas Mailhot]

--=-1s7Uvlq9E8suq1Y33l9v
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:42, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> That being said, I guess this should have been the first question:
>> Should bugs reported to bugme still be posted here (or elsewhere when
>> appropriate)?  I would assume so, at least for a while.
>
>Yes!
>
>The bugzilla database is a great idea but it should remain a database
>i.e. a list.  Discussion and the initial reporting of bugs should remain
>on the relevant lists _please_.

Please do not force users to report X times the same bug in different place=
s.=20

This will only lead to lost information since people won't drag the whole=20
problem history each time. OTOH at least the initial stage of bug submissio=
ns=20
should be cc'd to the relevant lists, so that interested people can get on =
the=20
problems. This is what apache does (with big fat warnings to not reply to t=
he=20
mail but fire bugzilla instead) and it seems to work well.

Regards,

--=20
Nicolas Mailhot <[e-mail]>

--=-1s7Uvlq9E8suq1Y33l9v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
	numériquement  signée

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA91CdQI2bVKDsp8g0RAscEAJ0QiDkCrf61Rc86ikQOt0JII1qKSQCdHcij
mIWMkx6i1kXVnupkIsBvu/w=
=8vrj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-1s7Uvlq9E8suq1Y33l9v--