Re: [SSI] Re: Distributed Linux

[Prasad]

> 
> Yeah, openSSI approach has some advantages, but how about the other side,
> how are the devices and files being handled?  isn't it wrong to run
> someone elses process when the data that he is supposed to provide is
> missing?  My work is based on a workstation model where all the nodes are
> independent workstations (in most cases with similar configurations, as in
> a computer laboratory at a university).  One of my major constraints is
> that the system should be binary compatible with the kernel that does not
> support my model. In my case i plan packing and restarting a process when
> the creation node goes down.
> 
> Prasad.
> 

Missed something in my previous one... even i am migrating only part of 
the system mode computations on the creation node. They only include the 
device/filesystem handling syscalls.  Most of the other things, that 
correspond to the process and memory management are being executed on the 
host system itself.

Prasad.

-- 
Failure is not an option