Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly

[Denis Vlasenko]

On 12 November 2002 22:10, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
> (sorry to answer to not-final-version mail, but didn't keep the last
> one. This also applies, anyway...)
>
> On 2002.11.03 Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > On 3 November 2002 14:17, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > > It seems gcc started to de-inline large functions.
>
> [...]
>
> > diff -urN linux-2.5.45.orig/include/linux/compiler.h
> > linux-2.5.45fix/include/linux/compiler.h ---
> > linux-2.5.45.orig/include/linux/compiler.h	Wed Oct 30 22:43:05 2002
> > +++ linux-2.5.45fix/include/linux/compiler.h	Sun Nov  3 15:19:20
> > 2002 @@ -20,3 +20,11 @@
> >      __asm__ ("" : "=g"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr));		\
> >      (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
> >  #endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */
> > +
> > +/* GCC 3 (and probably earlier, I'm not sure) can be told to
> > always inline +   a function. */
> > +#if __GNUC__ < 3
> > +#define force_inline inline
> > +#else
> > +#define force_inline inline __attribute__ ((always_inline))
> > +#endif
>
> This should go before the #endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */, isn't it ?

Oh... You are right...
--
vda