Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest

[mark walters]

 --- Con Kolivas <[e-mail]> wrote: 
> 
> I agree. Fortunately I don't think it's as bad a
> tradeoff as these numbers make
> out. The load accounting in contest (johntest?) is
> still relatively bogus. Apart
> from saying it's more or less loads I dont think the
> scale of the numbers are
> accurate.

Is the number of loads the total number of loads done
during the kernel compile or the number of loads per
unit time during the kernel compile? I was guessing
the former. (Andrew appeared to be guessing the
latter?)

Mark
 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com