Re: kexec (was: [lkcd-devel] Re: What's left over.)

Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com)
11 Nov 2002 11:25:06 -0700


Andy Pfiffer <andyp@osdl.org> writes:

> On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 21:36, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> > It strikes me that "load a blob of data into physical memory and keep it there
>
> > until further notice" is actually relatively generic mechanism, and something
>
> > there might be other reasons for root or various devices to do. (DSPs that
> > want their firmware in system ram? 3D models and textures for an onboard
> > video card?) If I'm wrong, would somebody be kind enough to tell me why?
> >
> > Rob
>
>
> Yes, that is rather generic -- somewhat like a variable-sized ramdisk.
>
> I think the key difference is that the ramdisk wants to hold blobs of
> data that will be accessed from user-mode by read & write.

kexec at least at the end, and probably for earlier for handling
panics wants code to be in a very specific location in ram.

If you want to hook the functionality behind in behind kexec_load,
when say KEXEC_FIXED is passed as a flag, go ahead. There is enough
other setup to jump to the code loaded into memory that "load a blob
of data into physical memory and keep it there" is not a sufficient
interface.

In the general case I using some kind of scatter gather list seems
the most polite way to go.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/