On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 01:00:26PM -0800, Rusty Lynch wrote:
> I noticed that kprobes is designed around the idea of only allowing
> a single probe point per probe address. Why not allow multiple probe
> points for a given probe address? Is it a way of limiting complexity?
>
We didn't think it would be useful and conceptually, it is simpler to
think of one probe at an address.
> It looks like it would be fairly straight forward to change get_kprobe(addr)
> to be get_kprobes(addr) where it returns a list of probe points associated
> with the address, and then tweak do_int3 to work through the entire list.
> Would such a change be acceptable?
>
It will be trivial to add this, but why? Is there a good reason
for wanting to do this (multiple kprobes at same address) as opposed
to doing all you want done on a probe hit in a single handler?
Regards,
Vamsi.
-- Vamsi Krishna S. Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore. Ph: +91 80 5044959 Internet: vamsi@in.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/