No movement, and I don't particular see there's going to be any movement
on this one. There are too many variables that changed around the time
that the serial code went in to allow the cause to be isolated.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> open 15 Oct 2002 oops stopping serial
> 36. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103470900729987&w=2
Fixed.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> open 24 Oct 2002 serial driver bug with asus motherboard
> 67. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103548912126308&w=2
Awaiting feedback from Andrew Walrond; the code as of 2.5.46 allows
better remote debugging of wrong/mis-detections.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> open 07 Nov 2002 odd deref in serial_in
> 84. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103647077515688&w=2
Not my problem - it looks like something else is trampling on %ebx,
although Zwane/myself are at a loss to locate the cause of that.
(%ebx = "up" pointer, which must have been valid a few instructions
previous to even get to this point in the code. Could it be a compiler
bug?)
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/