Re: 2.5.45 build failed with ACPI turned on

David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 15:08:42 +0000

davidsen@tmr.com said:
> More to the point, define CONFIG_PM as ( CONFIG_APM | CONFIG_ACPI )
> and be able to easily handle any new PM method on whatever hardware.
> PM is not limited to Intel hardware. Make a new HAS_PM if reusing
> CONFIG_PM creates problems.

Er, there's no reason why PM even on Intel hardware should be restricted to
ACPI and APM. With appropriate chipset documentation there's nothing to stop
people from writing proper driver code to enter sleep states, etc. for i386
chipsets just as we have for other architectures.

--
dwmw2




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/