Re: ps performance sucks

[Miquel van Smoorenburg]

In article <1036536496.777.57.camel@phantasy>,
Robert Love  <[e-mail]> wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 17:46, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>> 
>> > (tough luck if you're using some other ps)
>> 
>> Why do your procps mails always contain more references to
>> procps 2 than to your own version ?
>> 
>> What is your obsession with procps 2 ?
>
>Because he forked procps and cannot get over it.

For the record, I'm using Alberts procps (using Debian), I have
no idea what the code looks like, but it has a very high
useability factor. No idea why everybody keeps flaming Albert
for doing a good job.

Mike.