For arhlon, to try the new copy_user,
I run the Taka's socket benchmark program between CONFIG_M686 and K7.
http://www.suna-asobi.com/~akira-t/linux/netio-bench/netio2.c
CONFIG_MK7
(off:100, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.117 seconds at 342.9 Mbytes/sec
(off:104, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.114 seconds at 350.1 Mbytes/sec
(off:108, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.115 seconds at 347.9 Mbytes/sec
(off:112, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.113 seconds at 354.8 Mbytes/sec
(off:116, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.112 seconds at 358.1 Mbytes/sec
(off:120, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.113 seconds at 354.2 Mbytes/sec
CONFIG_M686
(off:100, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.090 seconds at 445.1 Mbytes/sec
(off:104, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.090 seconds at 442.4 Mbytes/sec
(off:108, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.089 seconds at 447.2 Mbytes/sec
(off:112, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.091 seconds at 438.7 Mbytes/sec
(off:116, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.091 seconds at 440.7 Mbytes/sec
(off:120, size:0x800000)
send/recv: copied 40.0 Mbytes in 0.090 seconds at 442.7 Mbytes/sec
It looks like improving, but it could be X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 6/5
problem that I post it previously.
-- Akira Tsukamoto <akira-t@suna-asobi.com, at541@columbia.edu>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/