Re: linux/bug.h and asm/bug.h

William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 18:43:05 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jennie Haywood: "Re: [lkcd-general] Re: What's left over."
Previous message: Skip Ford: "Re: Oh no, local symbols in discarded section .exit.text _again_ :)"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "linux/bug.h and asm/bug.h"
Next in thread: Ralf Baechle: "Re: linux/bug.h and asm/bug.h"

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:22:45PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> As the number of bug-related macros grows, this makes sense.
> 1) Introduce linux/bug.h and #include it from linux/kernel.h so noone
> breaks.
> 2) Move BUG() macro from asm*/page.h to asm*/bug.h, and #include it.
> Thanks,
> Rusty.

Thank you, this is a longstanding source of irritation (from the
standpoint of mere cleanliness) here.

Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jennie Haywood: "Re: [lkcd-general] Re: What's left over."
Previous message: Skip Ford: "Re: Oh no, local symbols in discarded section .exit.text _again_ :)"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "linux/bug.h and asm/bug.h"
Next in thread: Ralf Baechle: "Re: linux/bug.h and asm/bug.h"