Ah. I see.
> When I suddenly find I have less data to copy than I thought, it
> screws up the code.
Having a less-than-expected amount to copy sounds like it can
be safely handled?
> > I'm not really sure what to suggest here. Emptying the per-cpu
> > page pools would be tricky. Maybe a swsusp-special page allocator
> > which goes direct to the buddy lists or something.
>
> Well, see the patch above. That seems to do the trick for
> me. It seems that even "cold" allocation can give page from per-cpu
> pool. I thought that was a bug?
There are two queues per cpu. cache-warm pages and cache-cold
pages. The cold queue is mainly for lock amortisation, to avoid
taking the zone lock once per page. But we can also allocate
from the cold queue for situations where we'll be invalidating the
cache anyway (file readahead). We don't want to waste cache-hot
pages. Your change breaks that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/