Re: Where's the documentation for Kconfig?

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Russell King wrote:

> Ok, next problem.
> 
> A "hex" config entry under the old config language used to omit the "0x"
> prefix, requiring it to be added by whatever used it.  Kconfig adds the
> "0x" prefix, thereby causing errors.
> 
> Is this difference intentional?

No, but looking at it, I think it's better to fix the few users and to 
keep it common instead. Is there anything that needs the numbers without 
the prefix?

bye, Roman