Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] Updated sys_epoll now with man pages

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:

| On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
|
| > Yes, I knew that and I thought about it while typing, but
| > my dynamic RAM was too dynamic and not being refreshed often
| > enough.  Thanks for doing it for me.
|
| I knew it, I already sent you the links before :)
Yep.  8:)

| > BTW, I didn't mean unpopular for the epoll patch, I meant
| > unpopular in general, especially for development kernel patches:
| > if every new feature required docs along with it, it might slow
| > down Linux development by one day, but help out everyone in
| > the long run (tm?).
|
| I do agree Randy about comments, don't get me wrong. But you know what my
| job condition is :) Looking at the kernel source though, you find
| something like :
|
| 	/* add the fd to the interest set */
| 	do_add_fd_to_the_interest_set();
|
| and then you have the code that really would need comments completely
| naked. While, again, I do agree that comments are completely missing in
| the patch, I'm not that kind of guy that would like a function like :
|
| static struct epitem *ep_find_nl(struct eventpoll *ep, int fd)
| {
...
| }
|
| commented with "search an fd inside the hash". What a comment like that
| adds to this code ?

nada.

Just to be clear (and reiterate), my comments were not about
the epoll patch, but about adding new features/kernel APIs/etc
in general.

Later,
-- 
~Randy