Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll

[Shailabh Nagar]

bert hubert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:14:19AM -0800, Hanna Linder wrote:
> 
> 
>>	The results of our testing show not only does the system call 
>>interface to epoll perform as well as the /dev interface but also that epoll 
>>is many times better than standard poll. No other implementations of poll 
> 
> 
> Hanna,
> 
> Sure that this works? The following trivial program doesn't work on stdinput
> when I'd expect it to. It just waits until the timeout passes end then
> returns 0. It also does not work on a file, which is to be expected,
> although 'select' returns with an immediate availability of data on a file
> according to SuS.

I'm checking this and will let you know.

> Furthermore, there is some const weirdness going on, the ephttpd server has
> a different second argument to sys_epoll_wait.

You're right. The ephttpd server on Davide's page needs to add a cast
(struct pollfd const **) to the second arg passed to sys_epoll_wait.
The version of dphttpd used to generate the results had that fix in it.

-- Shailabh