The "huge disorganized heap 'o patches" thing was an attempt to get Rusty to
post some kind of description or announcement for the patches (and I believe
has been in the last three or four versions unchanged), but if those either
aren't being pushed for 2.5, or he wants to do it himself and doesn't want
them to be on my list, I'm fine with that...
> The way you have the Kprobes
> stuff listed for example could disuade Linus from including it. Only
> the base kprobe patch was submitted, the rest were posted out of
> kindness for those of us playing with it.
The IBM guys asked me to put kprobes on my list. The relationship between
kprobes and dprobes is something I had to ask about two or three times before
getting particularly clear on (since I don't use it), and what I have links
to is what they told me.
> I'd hate to see the number
> of patches work against it (especially since I requested the extra
> patches.)
I have yet to see Linus complain that a change has been been broken into too
many pieces for him. :)
Rob
-- http://penguicon.sf.net - Terry Pratchett, Eric Raymond, Pete Abrams, Illiad, CmdrTaco, liquid nitrogen ice cream, and caffienated jello. Well why not? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/