Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)

Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 05:09:00 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew Morton: "[patch] Fix file-corrupting bug, kernels 2.5.41 to 2.5.44"
Previous message: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.5.44uc1 (MMU-less support)"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)"
Next in thread: Andrew Pimlott: "Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)"

> A) the spurious rebuild is still a tiny fraction of a second.

It can trigger other rebuilds which can take much longer.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "[patch] Fix file-corrupting bug, kernels 2.5.41 to 2.5.44"
Previous message: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.5.44uc1 (MMU-less support)"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)"
Next in thread: Andrew Pimlott: "Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)"