On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:08:45PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:51:17PM +0200, Rasmus Andersen wrote:
> > o SWAP and BLOCK_DEV as modules
>=20
> modules won't work I guess :) but allowing to disable them is a good
> idea. Not that swap depends on the block device code, though.
The module approach was just a happy thought jotted down from an
IRC log. I guess there is a number of reasons that that won't=20
work.=20
I did not meant to imply that SWAP and block was related, just
that both (perhaph) could be made modules.
Thanks for your comments,
Rasmus
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQE9twkGlZJASZ6eJs4RAuGnAJiz9Ck53F+6nbXMugUnlqI9kJgyAJ97Y4zo
mc9tsADdoWt+c2lkrsHH9w==
=9Eac
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/