I'm very sorry. I could have sworn you had said something along the
lines of 'Some day I want to put version control into reiser, which
could technically be considered a competitor to bitkeeper. I have a lot
of other things to do with reiserfs as well so I'll do those first'. But
when I went back through the list, I couldn't find it.
The closest to that I could find was the following:
> reiser4 will not contain version control. I don't know when version
> control will go into ReiserFS. I do think it should go in eventually
> though, as it makes distributed filesystems more effective if there is
> version control functionality. We would do something that in no way
> resembled BK. We would do it after implementing the core distributed
> tree algorithms. Probably not going to happen in less than 3-5 years.
> ...
> There are so many features missing from ReiserFS, and I am not really
> picky about what order they go in..... With Reiser4 we finally have
I must have gotten the issues involved with reiserfs confused with
another project.
Again, I'm sorry I got your position wrong.
-- GnuPG fingerprint AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 James Blackwell -- Director http://www.linuxguru.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/